Of course he'll defend it. Remember when he said he might consider abandoning the deployment in order to improve relations? Now why do you suppose he's reversed course? Does anyone believe that he gives a hoot about defending Europe against some errant missle from Iran? He can't even defend his own country from puny North Korea. What a joke. Like Bush before him, Obama is controlled by the US power broker elite that runs the G7. They need the missle system as a hedge against Russias control over natural gas supplies to eastern Europe. If Obama plays by their rules, they believe Russia will eventually cave and the power brokers will get the lucrative gas contracts they so desperately want. Putin knows this and he has no plans to cave on anything. All it will do is bring back the cold war days. Does anyone really think Obama can stand up to Putin?
Let's make it simple and introduce the standard legitimate walk away position in any negotiations, either the Anti-Russian AMD goes or we walk away! Quite simple really! Walking away has huge advantages for us, at the present moment, it would allow us to focus and strengthen our nuclear capabilities, which is the only way we can remain free. Our demographics is against us, with NATO preparing for war. So the only sensible position is to actually increase our Nuclear capabilities, especially short range in Europe, not reduce them. We would actually win from walking away from thid deal at the moment.
Martin Bormann's story tells the whole tale. Henry Makow has written this in his brilliant PhD. style, footnotes and other forms of fact finding to bring indisputable evidence of what we are up against in this time, the same 'people' RULE today, as they did then with Martin Bormann has one of their most cherished.
Now, with this said | known ... why in the heaven and earth of this universe which is all we appear to understand in our limitations, would those who have come sooooooo far (BUSH SAID WE'RE HALF WAY THERE! IN HIS 'EXIT SPEECH'), agree to the idea of balance?
There is war alright and the target knows who is striking at it, as well, the strikers are the same today, as Henry Makow has pointed out AND, they continue to win which should give Russia pause since the last time this agenda was there in the lands of "Old Europe," it gave the masters of the universe the taste of success and they are NEVER going to accept anything other than ALL the energy -- of all the energy, all the time.
Tragically to those who know no boundaries there is no such thing as a boundary and the same 'people' who have been at this game of brain controlled criminal insanity are extremely dangerous indeed since the perfection of this mental harvesting of the human psyche is a cleverly crafted evil tool. Read Henry Makow RT, et al., should the courage spark a brush fire to ignite the knowledge of freedom to act on behalf of higher intelligence.
July 04, 2009, 20:50
Of course he'll defend it. Remember when he said he might consider abandoning the deployment in order to improve relations? Now why do you suppose he's reversed course? Does anyone believe that he gives a hoot about defending Europe against some errant missle from Iran? He can't even defend his own country from puny North Korea. What a joke. Like Bush before him, Obama is controlled by the US power broker elite that runs the G7. They need the missle system as a hedge against Russias control over natural gas supplies to eastern Europe. If Obama plays by their rules, they believe Russia will eventually cave and the power brokers will get the lucrative gas contracts they so desperately want. Putin knows this and he has no plans to cave on anything. All it will do is bring back the cold war days. Does anyone really think Obama can stand up to Putin?
July 02, 2009, 15:20
Let's make it simple and introduce the standard legitimate walk away position in any negotiations, either the Anti-Russian AMD goes or we walk away! Quite simple really! Walking away has huge advantages for us, at the present moment, it would allow us to focus and strengthen our nuclear capabilities, which is the only way we can remain free. Our demographics is against us, with NATO preparing for war. So the only sensible position is to actually increase our Nuclear capabilities, especially short range in Europe, not reduce them. We would actually win from walking away from thid deal at the moment.
July 02, 2009, 13:33
Martin Bormann's story tells the whole tale. Henry Makow has written this in his brilliant PhD. style, footnotes and other forms of fact finding to bring indisputable evidence of what we are up against in this time, the same 'people' RULE today, as they did then with Martin Bormann has one of their most cherished.
Now, with this said | known ... why in the heaven and earth of this universe which is all we appear to understand in our limitations, would those who have come sooooooo far (BUSH SAID WE'RE HALF WAY THERE! IN HIS 'EXIT SPEECH'), agree to the idea of balance?
There is war alright and the target knows who is striking at it, as well, the strikers are the same today, as Henry Makow has pointed out AND, they continue to win which should give Russia pause since the last time this agenda was there in the lands of "Old Europe," it gave the masters of the universe the taste of success and they are NEVER going to accept anything other than ALL the energy -- of all the energy, all the time.
Tragically to those who know no boundaries there is no such thing as a boundary and the same 'people' who have been at this game of brain controlled criminal insanity are extremely dangerous indeed since the perfection of this mental harvesting of the human psyche is a cleverly crafted evil tool. Read Henry Makow RT, et al., should the courage spark a brush fire to ignite the knowledge of freedom to act on behalf of higher intelligence.
Post comment